3 ms·
Time magazine readers are not an unbiased sample of America. Not even close.
by brador 12y ago
Time magazine readers are not an unbiased sample of America. Not even close.
- sp332 12y agoIn terms of income it's not that bad though. In 2011 the average Times subscriber had somewhat higher household income than average, but not that high. http://stateofthemedia.org/files/2012/01/25-Mags-Datablog-2012-News-Magazine-Readers%E2%80%99-Increase-Annual-Household-Income-Somewhat-in-2011.png http://stateofthemedia.org/files/2012/01/25-Mags-Datablog-20... But they are also 45 or older, so they'd have less time to look forward to being in the top 1% "someday". http://stateofthemedia.org/files/2012/01/26-Mags-Datablog-2012-News-Magazine-Readers-Are-Older-On-Average-in-20111.png http://stateofthemedia.org/files/2012/01/26-Mags-Datablog-20...
- adaml_623 12y agoYour arguing style is very sad. You make a suggestion and then when it is rebutted you don't try to refute it very well at all. Find the data and then you can make arguments.
- usefulcat 12y agoHow do you know the sample was limited to readers of Time?