5 ms·

Well, that just nuked my blog, and also my company's hubot. Ah well, guess I'll need to properly support that hubot now.

drewinglis 12y ago
It's probably worth it for your company to pay the $84/yr rather than have you go through hoops to move Hubot somewhere else.
Igglyboo 12y ago
I run my companies hubot on a $5 a month Digital Ocean instance. It's also far easier than using Heroku because it's just a regular linux server and not a managed/restricted instance.
- torkalork 12y ago
  I also use the $5-tier Digital Ocean droplets to host some side projects. I've had some processes die semi-regularly, though, because the OS does a scheduled maintenance task that maxes out the 512mb RAM. Adding a swap file seems to have taken care of it, though. I wish they enabled them by default on their smallest droplets: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-add-swap-on-ubuntu-14-04 https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-add-...
  - X-Istence 12y ago
    Or try running an alternate operating system that doesn't run a task semi-regularly that uses up all of your RAM.
- deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
imdsm 12y ago
I'm in the same boat with my blog. I'm not paying $7 for a single dyno when it's footprint is no-where near 512 mb. They should offer a smaller dynos at say 128 mb for $1.75, that I might be interested in. I'll be interested to see what they do to my existing apps.
- dangrossman 12y ago
  Viable business models for B2B businesses that involve charging the price of a fountain soda per month for anything are few and far between. Just charging your card that dollar costs a quarter or two, and sets up expectations that free tiers don't come with. So you may want a $1.75 fully managed PaaS, but it's doubtful anyone wants to sell that to you.
  - imdsm 12y ago
    Indeed, which is why they'll probably lose a lot of people. I'd be happy to put credit onto the account to use the smaller tier, or PayPal it or something, but I'm not paying for a big footprint that I'm not using.

drewinglis 12y ago

It's probably worth it for your company to pay the $84/yr rather than have you go through hoops to move Hubot somewhere else.

Igglyboo 12y ago

I run my companies hubot on a $5 a month Digital Ocean instance. It's also far easier than using Heroku because it's just a regular linux server and not a managed/restricted instance.

torkalork 12y ago
I also use the $5-tier Digital Ocean droplets to host some side projects. I've had some processes die semi-regularly, though, because the OS does a scheduled maintenance task that maxes out the 512mb RAM. Adding a swap file seems to have taken care of it, though. I wish they enabled them by default on their smallest droplets: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-add-swap-on-ubuntu-14-04 https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-add-...
- X-Istence 12y ago
  Or try running an alternate operating system that doesn't run a task semi-regularly that uses up all of your RAM.
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]

imdsm 12y ago

I'm in the same boat with my blog. I'm not paying $7 for a single dyno when it's footprint is no-where near 512 mb. They should offer a smaller dynos at say 128 mb for $1.75, that I might be interested in. I'll be interested to see what they do to my existing apps.

dangrossman 12y ago
Viable business models for B2B businesses that involve charging the price of a fountain soda per month for anything are few and far between. Just charging your card that dollar costs a quarter or two, and sets up expectations that free tiers don't come with. So you may want a $1.75 fully managed PaaS, but it's doubtful anyone wants to sell that to you.
- imdsm 12y ago
  Indeed, which is why they'll probably lose a lot of people. I'd be happy to put credit onto the account to use the smaller tier, or PayPal it or something, but I'm not paying for a big footprint that I'm not using.