Yes, this ruling is a pretty straightforward application of United States v. Jones, rather than much of a development in 4th-amendment law. The opinion [1] is 4

Yes, this ruling is a pretty straightforward application of United States v. Jones, rather than much of a development in 4th-amendment law. The opinion [1] is 4 1/2 pages long, and doesn't do much more than say exactly that: it points out that the lower court's holding is plainly incompatible with Jones, and sends it back down to be reheard accordingly. [1] http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-593_o7jq.pdf http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-593_o7jq.pdf