3 ms·
> The offensive part is the people who say that open offices are MORE EFFICIENT than a traditional office. To be fair, I don't think everyone that uses the ter
by pyre 12y ago
> The offensive part is the people who say that open offices are MORE EFFICIENT than a traditional office.
To be fair, I don't think everyone that uses the term "open office" is thinking "auditorium with 1000+ people." Attempting to extrapolate anything conclusions taken from open office environments of 4-10 people out to 1000+ people seems insane.
- Igglyboo 12y agoI work in an open office space that usually has around 6 people but never more than 10 and I like it a lot. 1000 sounds like a nightmare.
- sukilot 12y ago4-10 is team room, please don't confuse the conversation by calling it an open office. Don't be overly literal in mincing, let words have useful meaning.
- pyre 12y agoEven if this is the case, I don't think anyone has ever stated that an auditorium of 1000+ people is an "open office" either.