3 ms·
I second your point, it's about running to strategies in parallel: release every six months for early adopters, but limit mainstream efforts to every to years.
by hussong 17y ago
I second your point, it's about running to strategies in parallel: release every six months for early adopters, but limit mainstream efforts to every to years. Which would make a lot of sense IMHO.
From what I can tell, mainstream users don't care about having the latest software, they just want it to work. I've helped people migrate to Ubuntu who were still using Win98...
I wish they kept the applications more up to date in the LTS version though, I keep adding new sources and installing .debs to get newer versions, for instance of OpenOffice, LifeRea or Pidgin.
- steveklabnik 17y agoBut often, people _do_ want the latest versions of software. Remember when Firefox 3 came out a month or so after Ubuntu did? Everyone was stuck on FX2 for 5 months. Forums were filled with "omg I type apt-get upgrade firefox and I still don't have FX3, wtf???/"