2 ms·
Your comment is disingenuous. The case was not "one or two hops away" from malfeasance, it was the subject of said malfeasance. The fact that neither of the bad
by woah 12y ago
Your comment is disingenuous. The case was not "one or two hops away" from malfeasance, it was the subject of said malfeasance. The fact that neither of the bad actors testified in court, and that they may have been working in a separate office does not change this.
- tptacek 12y agoIt's disingenuous to ask if the "tainted" investigation is actually linked to the one that produced Ulbricht's conviction?