The more I think about the Turing Test, the more flawed (or hackable) I see it. What if instead of improving the computer I go the other way around and I put a

The more I think about the Turing Test, the more flawed (or hackable) I see it. What if instead of improving the computer I go the other way around and I put a disabled human (like an autistic or something) behind the curtain? This may certainly exhibit a very unnatural model of thought and make the computer harder to identify. If however, such hack would be prevented by the fact that the judge is the one that chooses his human subject for the test, like they knowing each other to some degree, then the test becomes more of a challenge to recognize the specifics that one particular person may have in relations with not only computers but other humans as well!