3 ms·
I think it all boils down to proportions and intentions. Of course, the two can be related. If a small % of your ads are scammy, it's unlikely that you will ge
by zaidf 17y ago
I think it all boils down to proportions and intentions. Of course, the two can be related.
If a small % of your ads are scammy, it's unlikely that you will get that much attention. Similarly, it's unlikely that you intentionally are allowing those ads when they make up a relatively small revenue stream.
On the other hand, if they account for significant revenue and you have the CEO talking on camera about these ads, something is wrong and you should get heat. The Google CEOs are usually talking about getting rid of these ads(not so much because of moral reasons as because they are not that desperate for revenue).
- dabent 17y agoThose are really good points. I know enough about affiliate marketing to know that acai ads get "slapped," but these top bidders seem to stick around no matter what. The FTC/various AGs have gone after some of the people running the acai ads, but I think the bigger problem is the rebills in general. There will always be a new ringtone, grant offer or diet pill to slap a rebill on. Anyway, I guess I'm not ranting about it.