for example apps have been rejected for bearing news about U.S. drone strikes[1]. FWIW, the app was eventually approved, although under a different name: http:

for example apps have been rejected for bearing news about U.S. drone strikes[1]. FWIW, the app was eventually approved, although under a different name: http://www.fastcoexist.com/3026320/your-iphone-can-now-alert-you-when-a-drone-attacks http://www.fastcoexist.com/3026320/your-iphone-can-now-alert... In fact, I would argue Apple is causing more damage than a state here or there allowing discrimination, due to their >1Bn install base. If Apple prevented users from accessing this info at all I might buy this, but considering this info (in this specific case) is still available via the web (the Guardian site works fine on an iPhone), I can't agree with this. Unless you have evidence of some info/activity that is only available via an app and not accessible on the web?