3 ms·

Great article, although I am not an expert in both CAP and ACID, it looks very reliable to me. I was surprised this was not mentioned yet: http://www.infoq.com

Great article, although I am not an expert in both CAP and ACID, it looks very reliable to me. I was surprised this was not mentioned yet: http://www.infoq.com/articles/cap-twelve-years-later-how-the-rules-have-changed http://www.infoq.com/articles/cap-twelve-years-later-how-the... (Eric Brewer revisits the CAP theorem and explains why it's not always a "black or white" case of "choose only two" triangle...)

nkeywal 12y ago
There is a kind of opposition between 'CAP as a theorem' and 'CAP as a tool to think about distributed systems'. The theorem does not leave much room for something else than black and white. But in the (great) paper you mention, there is a lot about "what is the future for distributed systems", it's more CAP-as-a-tool. In the post (and in the blog) I stick to the theorem. It's not 'right' or 'wrong', it's a choice. I made this choice because a lot of people are deciding their trade-offs with CAP-as-a-theorem, while actually CAP-as-a-theorem cannot be applied to the problem they're working on.