4 ms·
It absolutely is, and has been for a long time. I find it very hard to keep track of the various standards, but things got a lot simpler with v3 of the Single
by dap 12y ago
It absolutely is, and has been for a long time. I find it very hard to keep track of the various standards, but things got a lot simpler with v3 of the Single Unix Specification, which is the same as POSIX 2001[0].
The problem is that SUS and POSIX only define a subset of what's wanted by most modern software and a subset of the tools people need to interacting with the system. It's a double-edged sword, though: if we always stuck to what was common to all Unix-like systems, we wouldn't have lots of important OS features.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification#2001:_POSIX:2001.2C_Single_UNIX_Specification_version_3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification#2001:...
- cogburnd02 12y ago> [I]f we always stuck to what was common to all Unix-like systems, we wouldn't have lots of important OS features. Like seriously....It ain't even funny. :-| http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Limitations-of-Usual-Tools.html#Limitations-of-Usual-Tools http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/au...