Hmm, that's a very literal and limited conception of the 'Turing Test' – almost computer-like! On the other hand, these two very smart human technologists (Kapo

Hmm, that's a very literal and limited conception of the 'Turing Test' – almost computer-like! On the other hand, these two very smart human technologists (Kapor and Kurzweil) both seem OK with an actual-test reification of the 'Turing Test'. And then, the word 'fundamentally' has been thrown in to bluff confidence, but without providing actual supporting reasoning. That's a bit like some of the old ELIZA evasions. Based on the content, I vote the parent comment 'AI'. Did I get it right?