3 ms·
In my experience as a distribution maintainer, cmake is a lot more painful to deal with.
by davexunit 12y ago
In my experience as a distribution maintainer, cmake is a lot more painful to deal with.
- saboot 12y agoA lot of large projects* I use were formally autotools, and now use CMake. CMake is by far easier to maintain and allows easier integration this code in other projects with dependencies. I will agree that the documentation isn't great, the only way I was able to use it meaningfully by understanding how larger established projects utilize it. http://www-public.slac.stanford.edu/geant4/ http://www-public.slac.stanford.edu/geant4/ https://root.cern.ch/drupal/ https://root.cern.ch/drupal/ https://www.kde.org/ https://www.kde.org/