6 ms·

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_301 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_301

• eli 12y ago
  I think you are underestimating the volume of traffic. Simple generating that many 301s would be an issue. And... where would you redirect to?
  • kevinchen 12y ago
    Generating a 301 is certainly less work than rendering the entire user's profile page.
    • spartas 12y ago
      Generating a 301 is likely more work. Profile pages are simple database hits, and they may be dynamically or even statically cached (for popular pages). You're probably severely underestimating how much traffic China can produce [1]. 1. http://furbo.org/2015/01/22/fear-china/ http://furbo.org/2015/01/22/fear-china/
      • true_religion 12y ago
        A 301 avoids a database hit, and avoids having to go through the cache framework all together. It just says given this URL, we return an header that tells the browser to redirect. The only thing faster would be just dropping the connection as soon as its given to you.
        • rookieljw 12y ago
          Excuse me, Why no 403 or 404?
          • pbjtime 12y ago
            If I scroll up a bit, I see the reason is: > redirect the workload to some Chinese government's website and let them suffer what they've created.
      • tracker1 12y ago
        If verizon and the like can hold up traffic to/from Netflix... couldn't they just do the same for chinese traffic? Maybe redirect requests for baidu to a chinese version of google? I'm not saying this is a great idea, just that something could be done.
      • orf 12y ago
        A 301 is unequivocally less work in every respect.