3 ms·
[Diplomatic Hat On] I would personally stick with a Scheme or with one of the better CLs (SBCL, etc.) over newLISP. NewLISP is interesting for the space it o
by Shooter 19y ago
[Diplomatic Hat On] I would personally stick with a Scheme or with one of the better CLs (SBCL, etc.) over newLISP.
NewLISP is interesting for the space it occupies and it can be fun, but it also has some really wonky ideas that I think are mistakes and that will make it more difficult for you to grok other Lisps in the future. It is not a horrible language, but I think a person's time would be much better spent learning another Lisp. I would suggest that you Google comp.lang.lisp for newLISP. That should provide you with plenty of 'criticism' to digest. Several other people have asked the exact same question before on comp.lang.lisp.
Then, go to: http://gigamonkeys.com/lispbox/ http://gigamonkeys.com/lispbox/ once you've moved on ;-)
- aaco 19y agoThanks for the advice. Actually I'm already studying Common Lisp (from the Practical common Lisp book), and, well, I really liked its concepts. And surely, it can be used for practical purposes. It's a different and old language, I believe it's worthy to be studied.
- Shooter 19y agoCool. PCL is a great book. And, yes, CL is incredibly practical for many purposes. PCL/CL are much more worthy of your time than newLISP.