4 ms·
The title of the repo is spells "interpreter" correctly, so this submission's title should be fixed.
by chm 12y ago
The title of the repo is spells "interpreter" correctly, so this submission's title should be fixed.
- cespare 12y agoSimilarly it spells "Go" correctly :)
- CatDevURandom 12y agotl;dr - I'm upset because the raison d'etat for Go's name doesn't exist. Correct, no -- practical, probably. No matter how many gophers swear that {searchterm} + go returns just as good of results as {searchterm}+golang, it just isn't true. Maybe I'm just bitter because the reason Go was named Go was because -- and obviously I'm paraphrasing here... "we thought Oogle would be a really cool name for a debugger." Years later, here I am stuck searching {some search term} + GOLANG and step debugging with GDB. The worst part though is hearing people tell me, "Oh you know what, I realize how powerful printline statements and unit tests are for debugging! I don't even miss a debugger!" Or-- "have you tried GDB? Go Supports GDB! I haven't used it -- but it exists!" GDB is a god damn hate machine. And the chorus of "print statements are good enough" is motivated reasoning at its finest.
- dang 12y agoFixed.