3 ms·
I think that's an important thing though. Rust doesn't need to have concurrency built into the language like Go. With Go you are using their version of concurr
by nemo44x 12y ago
I think that's an important thing though. Rust doesn't need to have concurrency built into the language like Go. With Go you are using their version of concurrency. With Rust, you can use the standard libraries or find another library that suits your purpose.
So although Go does indeed have a well designed thread scheduler - I may discover after months of development on a project it isn't the thread system I need after all and now I'm stuck with a bunch of code I can't use.
Rust in general is far more underdeveloped than everything you mentioned and yes, right now, Go is probably a better choice - maybe.