3 ms·
On the issue of sock-puppets, it seems like you can have sock puppets for any issue. After reading https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9269760 https://news.yc
by MollyR 12y ago
On the issue of sock-puppets, it seems like you can have sock puppets for any issue.
After reading https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9269760 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9269760, I suspect there are not only "right" or "left" wing sockpuppets but corporate pr puppets too. I suspect some sockpuppets could drive up controversy to increase ad revenue or product awareness(viral marketing?) as well.
disclaimer:I have no opinion on this Atlantic article nor am I familiar with site. I just didn't think the original criticism of "conservatism" on HN was accurate.
Also I don't think I understand why an article(I don't feel the Atlantic piece is propaganda) can't be propaganda, and the comments section can't be propaganda in another direction.
I'm still looking at evidence,but a big and bold claim should have some fairly bullet proof evidence.
I'd also hold something like Crispr https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8171039 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8171039
to the same standard.
Game changing gene therapy ? I would like some good fairly bullet proof evidence.
Otherwise I think its reasonable to fall to a skeptical position.
- whybroke 12y agoOf course one should hold all ones beliefs lightly. But to dismiss quality evidence because of crackpot comments is irrational. I know nothing about gene therapy. But if you find a venue where peer reviewed papers on global warming are greeted by a flood of comments who deny it yet don't explain why then saying they are equally valid or equally likely to be propaganda is not being rational, it is failing to see a dangerous anti scientific social movement. >corporate pr puppets too To whit, post an article about Facebook's appalling privacy policy and watch what happens.