3 ms·
I'm pretty sure you're not making any claims in other jurisdictions implicitly — that would be somewhat terrifying. Whether the clause is triggered or not shou
by teamhappy 12y ago
I'm pretty sure you're not making any claims in other jurisdictions implicitly — that would be somewhat terrifying.
Whether the clause is triggered or not shouldn't matter if the patents aren't valid in your jurisdiction.
You don't have to state your rights — you just have them (there might be exceptions to this).
---
I'd love to get an answer to the bigger question as well.
- zaroth 12y ago> (there might be exceptions to this) Are there ever! For example, right against self-incrimination must now be invoked explicitly. Refusing to answer a question (they will say "being evasive") can be used against you unless you affirmatively state you are exercising your right to remain silent. [1] [1] - http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/chemerinsky_silence_is_not_golden_supreme_court_says/ http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/chemerinsky_silence_i...
- teamhappy 12y agoFortunately we germans don't have these kind of problems (yet.)