3 ms·
I'm surprised at someone actually taking the other side of this bet as I thought Sam was _very_ conservative on his projections. 1) Any one of those companies
by TimSchumann 12y ago
I'm surprised at someone actually taking the other side of this bet as I thought Sam was _very_ conservative on his projections.
1) Any one of those companies (besides Pinterest IMO) could conceivably achieve a market valuation of $200B by Jan 1, 2020.
2) Again any one of those companies (besides Teespring IMO) could conceivably achieve a market valuation of $27B by Jan 1, 2020.
3) Easy win for Sam.
- gitah 12y ago1) Do you really think Dropbox, with all the big co competition, can grow past its current valuation? Snapchat would have been a better choice in this list.
- TimSchumann 12y agoDropbox would have been my next closest to the bottom on that list, and while I think a $200B valuation on its own for Dropbox is a bit outlandish, it's conceivable. I thought about it like this... Would I bet that every company on this list will do worse than doubling their valuation over the next 5 years?
- dkrich 12y agoSeriously? As I write this, Microsoft, the largest purveyor of enterprise software in the world, is worth roughly $340 billion. Oracle? Less than $200 billion. Hell, Amazon, the company that Dropbox runs on isn't worth $200 billion. You honestly believe that any one of those companies, none of which has been around for more than ten years, could reach a market cap of $200B within 5 years? Either you are incredibly bearish on the dollar or we are officially in bubble times.
- bmelton 12y ago> You honestly believe that any one of those companies, none of which has been around for more than ten years, could reach a market cap of $200B within 5 years? That's not the bet. The bet is that they will, in aggregate be worth $200B. "Proposition 1: On January 1st, 2020, these companies will be worth at least $200B in aggregate." Edit: Can't read. The parent is in response to the grandparent, not the bet.
- TimSchumann 12y agoHe was referencing my statement above, not the bet.
- bmelton 12y agoThanks for the correction. Edited to reflect that.
- TimSchumann 12y agoYes, seriously. Which company is anyone's guess, and some are more likely than others, but it's conceivable a single company from that list could achieve a $200B valuation on a 5 year time scale.
- dkrich 12y agoMy point isn't really to take anything away from those companies. They're all very impressive. It's more that I am surprised that people don't seem to think that $200B is an incredibly large amount of money. It's more than three Ford Motor Company's. Or $80 billion more valuable than Cisco Systems, in many ways the backbone of the entire internet. It's just an incredibly large valuation to achieve for any company let alone in a five-year time frame.
- varunjuice 12y agoMajor difference between public market valuations vs private market valuations. Particularly, liquidation preference & anti dilution.
- dkrich 12y agoThere is no such thing as a $200B private market valuation. For a company to have that large of a valuation, it pretty much has to be a publicly-traded company by definition. If the argument is that somebody bought 0.001% of the company for $2,000,000, therefore 100% of the company is worth $200B, that's just a bridge too far.