3 ms·
Only if they had that as a contingency clause in the contract for the house. Which they probably didn't.
by Filligree 12y ago
Only if they had that as a contingency clause in the contract for the house. Which they probably didn't.
- drcube 12y agoFair enough. I'm not a lawyer. Just throwing out ideas.
- natch 12y agoYour idea is worth investigation. A contingency would not help with a suit. It would have helped in avoiding the purchase altogether, but that's another matter.
- maratd 12y ago> Only if they had that as a contingency clause in the contract for the house. Might be a good idea for the next house.
- natch 12y agoNo... a contingency is between the buyer and the seller. It just gives the buyer an out if certain things don't happen. It doesn't give Comcast any obligations in the matter. Comcast could be held accountable for other reasons, but not by a contingency.
- Filligree 12y agoThat was my point. There's no way to force Comcast to serve them, but they could have gotten out of the purchase.