5 ms·

Well, whats good for the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary should be ok for Google. http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/2015/3/at-the-f

• arcatek 12y ago
  How can an officiel website say "even when a president tries to unlawfully refuse to enforce our laws" ? It doesn't seem very neutral, I wouldn't except such an article to challenge the decision taken by the president of a country.
  • tedunangst 12y ago
    The president of the US is not the president of congress. Checks and balances and all that.
  • sethetter 12y ago
    The whole article is criticizing a decision he made, which caught me off guard as well.
  • briandh 12y ago
    It's the website of the House Judiciary Committee, which is controlled by Republicans, and hence can and does challenge the President. In turn, the White House website, which is controlled by Democrats, can and does challenge Congress. Both sites could, of course, adopt a stance of editorial neutrality. I would prefer they not, though -- both are fundamentally political organizations, so to do so would be eliding their true nature.
    • pandler 12y ago
      Not to mention that the whole purpose for the three branches of government is so that each branch will "check and balance" the other branches. The fundamental structure of the system is based on the premise that each branch should not be neutral with regards to the other branches.