3 ms·
On the other hand, persuing the strategy that Google did with Dart distracted people and effort from the important task of actually improving javascript, so it
by kybernetikos 12y ago
On the other hand, persuing the strategy that Google did with Dart distracted people and effort from the important task of actually improving javascript, so it may well have been a net negative.
- nathan_long 12y agoIf they'd succeeded in replacing it, there would have been no need to fix it. It's a big task, but I wish they'd succeeded and hope they (and/or others) try again. Whether you like JS or don't, I think we can all agree that it stinks to have only one choice for client-side scripting.