4 ms·
I just wonder, relatively, how big is the part of the ES6/7 driving community which were the people who hated on CoffeeScript because it required a compilation
by xixixao 12y ago
I just wonder, relatively, how big is the part of the ES6/7 driving community which were the people who hated on CoffeeScript because it required a compilation step (and now they love BabelJS). There will be things which you will always hate about JavaScript, visible, on the surface, and that will never go away. Compiled-to-js languages can hide these. This has been the best part of CoffeeScript, where it really shined, and this will carry over future compiled-to-js languages (PureScript, Elm etc.).
Unless it turns out that JS+Flow is actually the best balance between flexibility and safety and the world will reach "singularity".
- wycats 12y agoI don't remember much of an objection to CoffeeScript on the grounds that it requires a compilation step. For example, here was my statement advising Discourse to avoid CoffeeScript in 2013: https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-better-for-discourse-to-use-javascript-or-coffeescript/3153/19 https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-better-for-discourse-to-u...