3 ms·
You could make the same counter-argument about Facebook and Twitter. If you really think they're interchangeable, that just tells me that you don't value the t
by mbrubeck 12y ago
You could make the same counter-argument about Facebook and Twitter. If you really think they're interchangeable, that just tells me that you don't value the things that many of their users do.
Edit: Downvoted your original comment by accident, and there's no undo button. Sorry. :( Maybe someone else reading this can fix that?
- copsarebastards 12y ago> You could make the same counter-argument about Facebook and Twitter. If you really think they're interchangeable, that just tells me that you don't value the things that many of their users do. I don't think you could. Facebook doesn't offer an inferior product to Twitter, it offers products that are effectively the same, and come packaged with other products. I really don't think many people value the 140-character limit, which is the only core difference between Twitter and Facebook feeds. I can totally identify with the criticism that I don't value the same things as Twitter/Facebook users (I don't have accounts on either service). But I think I'm capable of empathizing with them and extrapolating what they value from each product.