3 ms·

In the analogy, people with children would be heavier and need another life vest (if they couldn't find another means to float). I'm confused by your men vs. w

• Lawtonfogle 12y ago
  >In the analogy, people with children would be heavier and need another life vest (if they couldn't find another means to float). We reach the breakdown point of the analogy because people trying to not drown are spontaneously sprouting new individuals. >If a woman has a child, a man had one too. To have a child requires the sperm from a man but requires the womb from a woman. Only the latter option requires the person to be fully attached and involved for the entire pregnancy. Thus, for a woman to get a man to participate in the required part for her to have a child is much much cheaper than for a man to get a woman to participate. So great is the difference the sperm banks exist where the man is about as removed from the equation as possible.