2 ms·

The two with discussion are certainly relevant. The others were not. To me, they served only to give the false impression that this has been discussed a lot mor

by arfliw 12y ago

The two with discussion are certainly relevant. The others were not. To me, they served only to give the false impression that this has been discussed a lot more than it actually has. > They are not intended to scold people for submitting things that have been submitted before So I guess that explains why you began with 'oh no, not again'

ColinWright 12y ago
> The two with discussion are certainly relevant. > The others were not. To me, they served only to > give the false impression that this has been > discussed a lot more than it actually has. That's why I said how many comment there were - to give the data that there were lots of submissions, not all of which had generated discussions. > So I guess that explains why you > began with 'oh no, not again' Yeah, OK, point taken. I guess I've just been around too long and read too much stuff. I went away for a while and have only just started to read again, but I guess I'm still too jaundiced. I'll go away again. Sorry. Do you want me to delete the comment? I think there's still time.
- dhimes 12y ago
  No, don't delete the comment. And don't go away!
- arfliw 12y ago
  I didn't realize you quoted the number of replies, I thought HN did that automatically. >I'll go away again haha i never said to go away. play it like it feels. i'm biased since you were responding to my submission.
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]