2 ms·
You don't need that `existential force` question to find hypothesis and answers to your first question. You are framing your question by opposing (`or`) that `e
by johnchristopher 12y ago
You don't need that `existential force` question to find hypothesis and answers to your first question. You are framing your question by opposing (`or`) that `existential force` to whatever your answer is to the first question.
- Cshelton 12y agoIt's really more rhetorical. Clearly I can't just oppose it because there is not a definitive answer. Just seeing what people think as far as the progression of mankind goes.