> However, we need to focus on a systematic cheapening of solar output per dollar for mainstream use, not clear solar panels that don't even make use of the mo

> However, we need to focus on a systematic cheapening of solar output per dollar for mainstream use, not clear solar panels that don't even make use of the most powerful spectrum of light.(even so I am still mostly in favor of this research) Solar already competes with oil despite comparatively massive subsidies for the oil industry. The problem at this point isn't the technology: the tech is good enough (although better would obviously be better--I'm not saying more research isn't warranted). The problem is government misdirecting funds into non-renewables. > Oil is way cheaper to make plastics with than any other organic element. Petroleum is cheaper to make plastics with, and only because oil companies have already footed the bill of locating and drilling the petroleum. If petroleum-based plastics ceased to be the byproduct of a much more lucrative industry they would cease to be as cheap. > Further when you devote arable land to something other than food there is always going to be market pressure that will drive up food prices. I don't think you have enough data to say that. Corn and soybeans are very different markets, and that's not even looking at other potential plant sources of plastics. Not all plant sources of plastic would be detracting from food production.