3 ms·
Funny you should mention that one in particular -- from our (SmartOS's) epoll(5) man page: While a best effort has been made to mimic the Linux semant
by bcantrill 12y ago
Funny you should mention that one in particular -- from our (SmartOS's) epoll(5) man page:
While a best effort has been made to mimic the Linux semantics, there
are some semantics that are too peculiar or ill-conceived to merit
accommodation. In particular, the Linux epoll facility will -- by
design -- continue to generate events for closed file descriptors
where/when the underlying file description remains open. For example,
if one were to fork(2) and subsequently close an actively epoll'd file
descriptor in the parent, any events generated in the child on the
implicitly duplicated file descriptor will continue to be delivered to
the parent -- despite the fact that the parent itself no longer has any
notion of the file description! This epoll facility refuses to honor
these semantics; closing the EPOLL_CTL_ADD'd file descriptor will
always result in no further events being generated for that event
description.
So while we do aspire to be bug-compatible, we're not about to compromise our principles over it. More details (or some of them, anyway) can be found in the talk on LX-branded zones that I gave at illumos Day at Surge 2014.[1][2]
[1] http://www.slideshare.net/bcantrill/illumos-lx http://www.slideshare.net/bcantrill/illumos-lx
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrfD3pC0VSs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrfD3pC0VSs