> there had better be sufficient assurance of liability in play because there is no element of trust This is the most powerful counter-point against such a ser

> there had better be sufficient assurance of liability in play because there is no element of trust This is the most powerful counter-point against such a service. The reason why Magic works so well is because your take-out or flowers order being 20 mins late is not the same as losing business data. That said, I'm not completely against the idea if the outsourcing method is made more transparent and it turns out there are both high levels of quality and liability assurance.