3 ms·
How do we feel about USA Today (http://www.usatoday.com/ http://www.usatoday.com/)? That's a Backbone SPA and it seems to work quite well (though the adverts c
by bshimmin 12y ago
How do we feel about USA Today (http://www.usatoday.com/ http://www.usatoday.com/)? That's a Backbone SPA and it seems to work quite well (though the adverts cause some loading unpleasantness from time to time).
It's certainly highly debatable as to whether there is any genuine benefit in presenting a text-heavy (in theory) site as a SPA. Bloomberg does the moderately clever "one article follows another article" thing, which I personally quite like but others here were fairly negative about.
- jessaustin 12y ago(though the adverts cause some loading unpleasantness from time to time) It seems most sites that have speed/responsiveness/usability problems, get those problems mostly from their ads. It doesn't reflect well on the site or on the ad. I suspect it's because the metrics ad networks are using don't capture their crappy performance. I wish the original sites themselves would track ad problems and thus drive SLA compliance.