> Static typing is like unit tests that take no maintenance. Um, no. At best they are like a tiny fraction (and trivial fraction at that) of the unittests requ

> Static typing is like unit tests that take no maintenance. Um, no. At best they are like a tiny fraction (and trivial fraction at that) of the unittests required. AND static typing often requires maintenance (as all code does) including initial burden of creating them in first place.