4 ms·
I often do flip a coin for binary decisions. Not everything is so simple though. For more open ended decisions I use deliberately and obviously irrelevant metr
by lamacase 12y ago
I often do flip a coin for binary decisions. Not everything is so simple though.
For more open ended decisions I use deliberately and obviously irrelevant metrics like wordplay or ad-hoc numerology.
It's useful for getting people to stop asking you where you want to go for lunch for example.
- cheatsheet 12y agoI do that too, but I still notice patterns. Then the mechanic for constructing of 'anti-patterns' for a choice mechanic is patterned itself. I just do my stuff for thinking new thoughts. I did a zen thing where I deconstructed every concept and word, and essentially "broke" it in my mind - gave it no power in it's meaning, and thus could not use it in reasoning. I did this over and over and over. The important part is that I didn't need a reason to destroy the meaning - because I've always lived maintaining my theories until they are proven incorrect, while accumulating information to build on them. But some stuff doesn't prove itself incorrect, because it's a self perpetuating pattern. That's where I became paranoid about viral ideas, things that are true simply by the virtue of their construction. The construction is considered correct, therefore application of the construction can never be questioned. And I don't know if that really means anything about human existence, but I know it pisses me off when I feel like I've been spoon-fed a way to think. Mine is useful for sitting alone in my room, staring at a wall of books. I don't really have a lunch problem. I eat lunch at my desk.
- balabaster 12y agoJust point them to Wheel of Lunch: http://wheelof.com/lunch/ http://wheelof.com/lunch/ ;)