4 ms·
> Or maybe I've just been unlucky/incompetent. Every lint extension I've seen seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the langua
by LeonRobrotsky 12y ago
> Or maybe I've just been unlucky/incompetent.
Every lint extension I've seen seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the language is.
- jdc0589 12y ago> seems to drag a full install of whatever the popular implementation of the language is. This is the biggest problem with sublime plugins. dependencies. It is also 100% why I refuse to add non-python dependencies to any plugins I write (which has really just been JsFormat thus far)
- mrec 12y ago> I refuse to add non-python dependencies to any plugins I write Is there a Package Control channel that ONLY lists packages following that noble rule? I'd be a lot more willing to try things out from that.
- lobster_johnson 12y agoAll the ones I use (cppcheck, jshint, jsxhint, ruby, clang) require that you have the toolchains already installed. Seems like a pretty consistent design. Those are the official linters [1], though. Edit: Checked a bunch of the others, including those for Lua, XML and Python. None of them come bundled with the underlying tool. [1] https://github.com/SublimeLinter https://github.com/SublimeLinter
- LeonRobrotsky 12y agoYou appear to be correct- my remark was based on what I guess is out of date experience.