5 ms·
I assume when you said "older population" you mean "people who have lived here longer." Because as you know, rent control applies to a housing unit regardless o
by ageek123 12y ago
I assume when you said "older population" you mean "people who have lived here longer." Because as you know, rent control applies to a housing unit regardless of the age of the person living in it.
But more importantly, I'm not sure what you mean by "people of privilege are working out a story that allows them to displace." As far as I can tell, what's happening is that landlords own property, and they see an opportunity to rent the property to someone who is willing to pay more. I'm not sure what "story" is being worked out by the new renter; by the time they find out about the property, it is already on the market.
- ZeroGravitas 12y agoI'm guessing they're talking about here on Hacker News, where young, rich professionals who may want to live and work in SF are upvoting stuff that undermines rent control. Which is convenient as they'd like to use their superior purchasing power to acquire nice SF apartments, and rent control blocks them from that goal. So it helps to have economics on your side, to a) make you feel better about yourself and b) to convince others to join your side. Maybe in this case that's "right", but the fact that we are collectively upvoting the economics that helps us and not approvingly discussing some other economic theory about how importing low-wage software developers would boost the economy makes it political.
- yummyfajitas 12y agoAs one of the pro-economics faction, I'm a strong proponent of offshoring and immigration. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9246255 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9246255 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9126011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9126011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8884775 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8884775
- whybroke 12y agoAnd therefore there is a direct arithmetic connection between rent control benefit and tenant age. The article involves improbable convoluted statistical conjectures yet is incapable of noticing that extremely simple correlation. Perhaps more disturbing than the ethical issue is the unconstrained confirmation bias. The "story" built here and in other articles is the minimal believable tale that gets rid of current generally older tenants to make those units available for people with more money. To reach the front page of HN, it only needs to be believable to those who will benefit from its implementation. Not a very high hurdle and usually easily reach by hand waving some misunderstood "free market" juvenilia.