> The second reads like so much resentment of an amorphous group. I'm not sure why I should prefer your brand to the other. I don't see resentful language and

> The second reads like so much resentment of an amorphous group. I'm not sure why I should prefer your brand to the other. I don't see resentful language and I built an argument on reasonbaly well-established facts. I understand my point may provoke members of that group; that's not my goal but it may be unavoidable when making a point that critical. I'd be interested in learning from you where you think the argument falls short. Your comment is only a negative characterization.