4 ms·
Whistleblowing on mgmt is a great way to get blacklisted, and one person's ability to quit their job does not address the root cause of the abuse. Why should t
by zaccus 12y ago
Whistleblowing on mgmt is a great way to get blacklisted, and one person's ability to quit their job does not address the root cause of the abuse.
Why should the burden be on the worker to find a new job anyway? If the abuse is coming from mgmt, it should be their responsibility to make it right.
- mhuffman 12y agoI agree, but how might you imagine that management would find this out if the person is unwilling to speak up, instead relying on the silent fear of the union to keep it at bay? Do you think that leaving the abusive manager in place, but impotent, is a better outcome? For whom? The company, the employees?
- Devthrowaway80 12y agoWhat makes you think that they were unaware of the abuse? It's a better outcome for the employees. They have more leverage over their managers and are protected from abuse. If the manager is seething and impotent over his inability to mistreat his employees, maybe he can do what others have suggested the employee do and find another job.
- EdwardDiego 12y ago> How might you imagine that management would find this out if the person is unwilling to speak up The entire management structure in place was the problem. Are you seriously suggesting I should have attempted to contact my manager's boss in the USA, instead of joining a union?
- mhuffman 12y agoYes, I am not only suggesting that, I am baffled as to how you think not making noise about it and letting it lay in some Mexican standoff with the union was better.