5 ms·
Method and system for shockwave attenuation via electromagnetic arc
- pavel_lishin 12y agoInteresting (and obvious) that the patent images show a military vehicle; what non-military purposes could this be used for?
- mundacho 12y agoFlight MH17 can be an example.
- trhway 12y agoMH17 was downed by the shrapnel from the missile, not the shockwave. The BUK missile's shrapnel number, density and speed was designed to take down, in particular, armored planes like A-10 (into the face, not from behind), so the plasma expansion speed to affect the shrapnel should be on the order of several Mach, something like jet exhaust for example.
- JoeAltmaier 12y agoHardening civilian infrastructure?
- Retric 12y agoThere clearly targeting explosions. But, plenty of things generate shockwaves so really expensive active sound dampening or just High frequency vibration dampening. There are probably far more cost effective approaches, but quieter dental drill for people that just hate the sound. There might be a safety advantage for quieter bone drills etc. Instrument isolation for scientific experiments.
- Gravityloss 12y agoI first thought this was for alleviating shock waves in supersonic flight, but I guess they've been doing these kind of things for a long time
- jkot 12y ago>A method and system for attenuating a shockwave propagating through a first medium by heating a selected region of the first fluid medium rapidly to create a second, transient medium that intercepts the shockwave and attenuates its energy density before it reaches a protected asset RPG protection on tanks works on similar principle. Americans have it for decades, Russians for past 15 years.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- dang 12y agoTitle changed from "Boeing's force field patent".
- kjhughes 12y ago...which I'd already toned down from CNET's article, "Boeing patents 'Star Wars'-style force fields", http://www.cnet.com/news/boeing-patents-star-wars-style-force-fields/ http://www.cnet.com/news/boeing-patents-star-wars-style-forc... where I first found the patent link, but using the actual patent title as you've done is better still.