It sounds like the more compensated made better choices. Why does risk-taking engender high pay than working for good money? If the facts in the books aren't wo

It sounds like the more compensated made better choices. Why does risk-taking engender high pay than working for good money? If the facts in the books aren't worth a damn to the employers, maybe the higher education has no market value? Just because someone says it's a 'good education' doesn't mean it breeds worthwhile labor in a market.