3 ms·
I note that the two unions you bring up are public-sector unions. It's worth considering that public-sector and private-sector unions are different beasts. For
by goldbeck 12y ago
I note that the two unions you bring up are public-sector unions. It's worth considering that public-sector and private-sector unions are different beasts. For one thing, private-sector unions are facing off against corporations - both trying to maximize their own value, and so one might hope a balance is achieved. In the public-sector, unions are trying to maximize their own value, but the government is (hypothetically) trying to maximize public good, so it's not really a fair balance.
Private-sector unions have been hugely helpful in the US. This article touches on it in an interesting way: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/19/opinion/nicholas-kristof-the-cost-of-a-decline-in-unions.html?_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/19/opinion/nicholas-kristof-t...
- pdonis 12y ago> the two unions you bring up are public-sector unions He also brought up the United Auto Workers, which is not.
- jjoonathan 12y agoYes, but only his complaints about the public sector unions were reasonable enough to address.
- pdonis 12y ago> only his complaints about the public sector unions were reasonable enough to address. I don't understand. His complaint is basically that public sector unions and private sector unions have the same problems.