> and on balance I'd say an electronic system should be able to do better Based on what evidence? Paper fraud requires a physical presence, and the scope is l

> and on balance I'd say an electronic system should be able to do better Based on what evidence? Paper fraud requires a physical presence, and the scope is limited to what a person or group of people can achieve. Breaching electronic systems can happen on the server or client (conversations around the latter are noticeably absent from arguments by e-voting proponents). Breaches can be orchestrated from anywhere, including locations which with no extradition agreement, and can use botnets to scale infinitely.