4 ms·
I don't think we will, and that is because no one cares. People don't seem to realize that working extremely long hours was the norm in the early 20th century.
by littletimmy 12y ago
I don't think we will, and that is because no one cares.
People don't seem to realize that working extremely long hours was the norm in the early 20th century. It was a long sustained effort by labor unions to those hours down from 100 a week to 40 a week.
We're regressing fast, but there will be no change in the US because everyone in this country believes they'll be the capitalists one day.
- enraged_camel 12y ago>>I don't think we will, and that is because no one cares. Correction: no one who is currently in power cares. But there are plenty of young people who absolutely despise working even 40 hours a week and would do anything to change it.
- TheCoelacanth 12y ago"Anything", of course, that doesn't involve turning out to vote.
- FatalBaboon 12y agoIn France, at least, I don't know anybody that thinks voting would change anything. You need a good option to vote well.
- TheCoelacanth 12y agoThat's a common mantra, but it's not true. The voter base, especially the voter base for primary elections, has a significant effect on the options that are available. If 100% of young people, or even 100% of all people voted in every election, the available options would be vastly different.
- cauterized 12y agoWhat makes you so certain? Have you run a candidate on a 30-hour/wk legislation platform and communicated that fact to 18-30 y/os via media they actually pay attention to, and measured how that affected voting rates?