I just had a quick look around that site and I wouldn't be referencing it as an argument against anything except good research practices. They seem to love pro

I just had a quick look around that site and I wouldn't be referencing it as an argument against anything except good research practices. They seem to love providing all sorts of links to the publications that back up their arguments, but none to the data they are claiming to refute. This leads to the illusion that they know what they're talking about, but they don't link to what they're actually refuting.