3 ms·
What about the monitoring and modification of online communities by the GCHQ? This doesn't even look resistant to that. Also, what about traditional ballot stu
by striking 12y ago
What about the monitoring and modification of online communities by the GCHQ? This doesn't even look resistant to that.
Also, what about traditional ballot stuffing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_100#Hacking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_100#Hacking anyone?
I could only trust this if there were attached a mathematical proof of its usability. Otherwise, I kind of doubt it's worth anyone's time.
- piamancini 12y agoWe are working to validate democracyOS votes with the blockchain. Happy to listen to any other suggestions
- tebou 12y agoPlease check out: https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/security/2014/08/30/every-vote-counts-ensuring-integrity-in-large-scale-electronic-voting/ https://blogs.ncl.ac.uk/security/2014/08/30/every-vote-count... This is a paper describing an end-to-end verifiable self-enforcing electronic voting system called DRE-i (Direct Recording Electronic with Integrity). In my opinion this is a superior solution to any other electronic voting system developed to date.
- piamancini 12y agoThank you!