I don't use Ubuntu and Redhat. Once they decided to follow a windows model with systemd and the "break everything on purpose" style of writing software, they we

I don't use Ubuntu and Redhat. Once they decided to follow a windows model with systemd and the "break everything on purpose" style of writing software, they were no longer useful. So what about the massive variety of other distributions that didn't - or cannot in the case of Free Software - sign up for the restrictions inherent in being "compatible with secure boot"? More importantly, why limit this to linux? It would be a lot harder to develop a new OS - just like Linus did - when you have to deal with secure boot.