3 ms·
Wait, I'm confused. Is that video the actual game and how everything actually looks, or is it a concept video with visual effects and props and whatnot by Weta?
by ykl 12y ago
Wait, I'm confused. Is that video the actual game and how everything actually looks, or is it a concept video with visual effects and props and whatnot by Weta? Because up until now, I was under the impression that it was the latter.
- mtinkerhess 12y agoIf that footage is in-engine I'll eat my hat.
- cheald 12y agoFrom their official YouTube account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPMHcanq0xM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPMHcanq0xM "This is a game we’re playing around the office right now" is extremely provocative. Edit: ah, you removed your request for citation. Doh. :)
- mtinkerhess 12y agoSorry for mixing things up with a ninja edit! The article says: > This is the video of a real-world, first-person shooting game that Magic Leap says it was going to show at TED this week. At first I parsed that as saying Magic Leap was going to show the game at TED, but what I've seen other articles say is that they were going to show this video at TED. There is no way this is in-engine AR. This has to be a concept video for a prototype they're working on. For them to say they're playing this around the office isn't exactly a lie -- they may very well be working on a prototype that has similar mechanics -- but it's bending the truth.
- nknighthb 12y agoI'm not clear what's so surprising to you. AR has been progressing rapidly. This looks like the next iteration. It's not some giant leap from what we've seen before, or even what's in millions of consumers' hands right now.
- slight 12y agoNo it's really not. This is a long way from anything that's been shown so far and is clearly a mock-up. The devil is in the detail, the production value is too high and the visual integration between the CGI and real elements is too slick.
- rawnlq 12y agohttp://13thlab.com http://13thlab.com who got acquired by Oculus made something very very similar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA2NI4NgsV0&t=19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA2NI4NgsV0&t=19 so the technology for doing this is feasible and real. Their previous kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1203948132/rescape-fps-games-on-mobile-should-be-more-not-les https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1203948132/rescape-fps-...
- mtinkerhess 12y agoThat's a cool-looking video. It looks like it isn't AR though -- it looks like they're taking the real-world position of the phones and using that to drive the positions of the players in the game. They've modeled the game so the level looks the same as the office they're playing it in.
- choppaface 12y agoMagic Leap PR has not yet confirmed if the video is an authentic demo of the product ( http://recode.net/2015/03/19/the-first-video-of-magic-leaps-technology-looks-fake/ http://recode.net/2015/03/19/the-first-video-of-magic-leaps-... ). One hypothesis is that PR commissioned the video and planned to show it at TED and other venues. IMO the video definitely looks produced and it was prudent to cancel the talks rather than spin the video as a plausible demo of their product. Re/code's comparison to Google's hype of Glass is a little harsh, but nevertheless if the video is indeed "fake" this would be yet another example of Marketing being completely reckless with consumer expectations. I'm sure the Magic Leap product has some impressive strengths. Better to let the product speak than to let Marketing try to "lift" something different that doesn't exist.
- chralieboy 12y agoRe-watching the glass video, compared what was actually launched, their criticism seems fair in retrospect. It is also a great comparison on another level. This product may be amazing, but whatever it takes to make it happen is so unwieldy that no one would want to use it. Glass didn't fail only on the product experience, but on the social stigma aspects as well. Odd gruntings aside, until we actually see the product it is hard to say it will sell. A good example of this is Apple. Presentation is equally important as the actual tech (hence these unrealistic marketing videos.)