This argument is certainly logically sound but maybe it is ok for law abiding citizens to be prevented from owning machine guns. Also, lets prevent them from o

This argument is certainly logically sound but maybe it is ok for law abiding citizens to be prevented from owning machine guns. Also, lets prevent them from owning missiles, nuclear weapons, and deadly nerve gas. But where does one draw the line? Cars can be deadly weapons too! And plastic forks! Maybe it's somewhere around "objects whose sole designed purpose is to kill large numbers of humans in a short period of time". Isn't there a base level evolutionary incentive for everyone to have as few objects like that near them as possible?