3 ms·
Now compare that against the hundreds of papers describing the negative impact of sugar consumption. You're comparing subtle, little understood second order ef
by TTPrograms 12y ago
Now compare that against the hundreds of papers describing the negative impact of sugar consumption.
You're comparing subtle, little understood second order effects to a first order caloric increase due to sugar intake that we know is the leading cause in the modern obesity epidemic. N=40 single studies demonstrating minor differences can't compete with the massive body of evidence against caloric sweeteners.
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoMy point isn't that sugar is good. My point is that people are reasonable to be concerned about the health consequences of artificial sweeteners.