Uh, publishing your source under a usable license is sorta really the definition of open source. Whether or not you like their dev style or other things is sepa

Uh, publishing your source under a usable license is sorta really the definition of open source. Whether or not you like their dev style or other things is separate and trying to make new definitions. You shouldn't just throw caps on a common description then claim no one is that common thing because you've redefined it.